National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Gulf Research Program

Incorporating Equity and Social Vulnerability Into the Design of Flood Risk Mitigation Strategies

Tool Developers: Purdue University: David R. Johnson and Utkuhan Genc. The Water Institute: Jordan R. Fischbach, Scott Hemmerling, Allison Haertling, Patrick Kane, Audrey Grismore

Incorporating local knowledge into the design of more equitable solutions to climate hazards can produce a better picture of on-the-ground challenges and locally acceptable solutions. In addition, bringing this information together in an easy to read and understandable dashboard improves support for planning around flood risk adaptation options such as elevating residential buildings or voluntary acquisitions. This project shows how interactive visualization tools can incorporate qualitative and quantitative information to support better planning and risk analysis.

The Challenge

Too often, the development of solutions to climate-related environmental problems depends on purely measurable datasets and models which can give a feel for the challenges communities face but do little to incorporate lived experience. In this project, the team from Purdue and The Water Institute brought together residents in the communities of Cameron, Morgan City, Slidell, and Stephensville for their input on a range of topics. These included community demographics, flood depths during different types of storms, drive time to nearest essential services such as hospitals or grocery stores, and more.

The Approach

The project team conducted scenario-building workshops with local/regional planners, residents, and other stakeholders in four different coastal communities in Louisiana to identify decision-relevant measures of the impacts nonstructural risk mitigation strategies could have on equity, social vulnerability, economic risk, and resilience at the individual/household and community levels.

Working with community members in a workshop setting, the project team co-produced “decision trees” which examined actions or inactions and each scenario’s impact. The groups produced these decision trees for each of the following scenarios: no action, differing residential elevation, and voluntary acquisition. Through the development of these decision trees, the groups identified impacts to the individual and community if these nonstructural mitigation strategies were, or were not, implemented. Through this process, the project team identified several "tipping points" beyond which community members are likely to move away from the community.

The decision trees showed that while there are site-specific elements that are localized to one community, many others, such as flood depths, affordability, quality of life, and sense of community are considered important across the Louisiana coastal zone.

After working with communities, the project team collected and analyzed relevant federal, state, and local data to support development of a customized decision support tool to address the needs identified with each community.

The resulting publicly available tool provides interactive visual information about each localized community, but also serves as a centralized location for users to access data visualizations of coastwide population change and flood exposure over time.

The Dashboard